The current VBER expires on May 31, 2022. The VBER and vertical guidelines are part of the EU regulatory framework that governs so-called “vertical” agreements: they are concluded by companies at different levels of the supply chain and allow the parties to ensure a “path to the market” for goods and services. Vertical agreements are the cornerstone of EU marketing and procurement agreements and are one of the most common trade agreements that must comply with EU competition rules. As a result, the VBER and vertical guidelines have played a decisive role in making available to companies an automatic system for clearing vertical agreements, provided they fall below market share thresholds and meet other VBER conditions and guidelines or vertical guidelines. There are cases where certain types of agreements do not automatically fall within the scope of Article 101 of the TFUE, for example. B: Vertical agreements may, however, present competition risks if there is a possibility. B increased barriers to entry, reduction or mitigation of competition and other opportunities where horizontal agreements are facilitated.  Whether a vertical agreement actually restricts competition and whether, in this case, the benefits outweigh the anti-competitive effects, often depends on the structure of the market. A vertical agreement is a term used in competition law to refer to agreements between companies at different levels of the supply chain. For example, a consumer electronics manufacturer could have a vertical agreement with a retailer to promote its products in exchange for lower prices. Franchising is a form of vertical agreement and, according to EU competition law, this falls within the scope of Article 101.  Vertical agreements that meet the exemption requirements and do not have so-called “strict” restrictions on competition are exempt from the ban under Article 101, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
The main exception concerns vehicle distribution agreements which, until 31 May 2013, are subject to a three-year extension of the Council`s Regulation (EC) (EC) No. 461/2010 (Regulation (EC) No. 1400/2002 .  Although the latter regulation is Regulation (EC) 330/2010 relating to agreements relating to the repair of motor vehicles and the distribution of spare parts from 1st It also complements Regulation 330 with three additional “hardcore” clauses in Article 101, paragraph 1, of the TFUE, which prohibits agreements between companies with the purpose or effect of restricting, preventing or distorting competition within the EU and which affect trade between EU Member States. This prohibition is relevant to all agreements between two or more companies, whether they are competitors. Competition problems arise when competition is not sufficient at one or more commercial levels. Vertical agreements are widely accepted because they are less likely to solve competition problems than horizontal agreements. Horizontal agreements are concluded between two current or potential competitors. Vertical agreements are agreements between companies operating at different levels of the production or distribution chain.
B an agreement between a producer and a distributor. Current EU rules require companies to assess for themselves the compliance of their vertical agreements with EU competition law, which prohibits competition-limiting agreements under Article 101, paragraph 1, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The VBER exempts certain types of agreements from the article 101 ban, paragraph 1, where certain conditions are met, giving companies confidence that their agreement is in line with EU competition law. Conclusion The Commission`s assessment of the VBER and the vertical guidelines strongly shows that the Commission will not allow the current regime to fall, as it has largely found that it has made a significant contribution to the legal and security of